Logout|My Dashboard
Wednesday, Jun 3rd - 12:37pm

Daily Record

House candidates' views on marijuana, gay marriage, abortion

Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Saturday, October 13, 2012 8:00 am | Updated: 10:38 am, Sat Oct 13, 2012.

The Daily Record posed three questions by email to Kaj Selmann and Mathew Manweller, the two state House of Representatives candidates for Position 2 in the 13th Legislative District that includes Kittitas County.

Here are their responses:


How will you vote on I-502, which would legalize recreational marijuana and why?

I will be voting no. Although I believe our drug laws need reform, I-502 is not the answer. It will put citizens, law enforcement officials and state agencies in a conflict with federal law. We would face multiple situations where citizens were in compliance with state law but could be prosecuted for violating federal law. In fact, many of the taxes collected by the state could be seized by the federal government. We would also be putting our law enforcement officials in the same precarious situation. Their job is hard enough without putting them in this legal limbo.

How will you vote on the gay marriage initiative and why?

I will be voting no. I am running for state representative and, as such, I am obligated to represent the values of my district. Through numerous statewide votes, the people of the 13th District have unambiguously indicated they do not support gay marriage. I am also concerned about the numerous provisions in the law that authorize civil lawsuits. A marriage bill should not be an attorney employment act.

What are your thoughts on requiring women to undergo ultrasounds, waiting periods or specific types of counseling before receiving an abortion?

In general, I oppose abortion with a few rare exceptions. When I saw my son Lincoln’s ultrasound at 3 months, I knew he was my child, that I loved him, and that he was a living being. I believe viewing ultrasounds would decrease abortions significantly. As an advocate of limited government, however, I would rather see doctors encourage ultrasounds rather than the state mandating them.


How will you vote on I-502, which would legalize recreational marijuana and why?

My primary concerns around I-502 are fiscal. While the initiative potentially offers much needed new revenue to the state budget, I doubt that is how it will play out. The conflict between the state law and the federal law on this issue would take millions of dollars in litigation costs before any of the potential revenue benefits would kick in. We have more pressing needs in education and infrastructure development. I do favor the repeal of prohibition at the federal level. There are real opportunities lost to our agricultural community when prohibition bans production of industrial hemp. It is one of the most easily grown and versatile plants in the world, and to deny our farmers and industry that commodity in the name of prohibition is a bad trade-off. I will be voting no on I-502, but only because of the fiscal risks.

How will you vote on the gay marriage initiative and why?

I think we’ve had enough of one group trying to make rules and regulations that only apply to someone else. Ref-74 is refreshing in that it is careful to only change the law for the people the law will directly affect. It has strong protections for clergy and religious institutions, so no one has to compromise their beliefs. It also provides for equal protection and privileges under the law, regardless of the person you choose to spend your life with. I have been married to my wife for nearly 15 years. My parents have been married for almost 50. I have tremendous respect for the institution of marriage, and as such, would not deny it to any of my fellow Washingtonians. I will support R-74.

 What are your thoughts on requiring women to undergo ultrasounds, waiting periods or specific types of counseling before receiving an abortion?

I think it is yet another example of one group trying to make rules and regulations that only apply to someone else. I wish more people understood where these types of laws were coming from. This is not homegrown legislation. The American Legislative Exchange Council is behind many of these types of laws. For some perspective, it costs $100 for a two-year membership for a legislator, and $14,000 to $50,000 for a company. They then sponsor “educational conferences” in places like Hawaii or Key West, and corporations can provide “scholarships” for legislators to attend, child care included.

There, they get to network with wealthy corporate donors and wealthy special interests. In exchange, those corporate and special interests get to draft and vote on model legislation with the legislators, and the legislators take that back to introduce to their states. These are pharmaceutical companies, private prisons, and, yes, device manufacturers. Well intentioned, conservative voters then end up supporting a bill that has very little to do with saving unborn lives, and more to do with selling invasive ultrasound devices.

I think requiring women to undergo expensive, invasive, and unnecessary treatments before they are allowed a legal medical procedure is fiscally irresponsible and morally reprehensible, particularly when these bills have more to do with lining pockets than they do with saving lives. I will never support legislation like this.



© 2015 Daily Record. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

  • Discuss

Welcome to the discussion.

1 comment:

  • abhi206 posted at 10:49 pm on Tue, Nov 27, 2012.

    abhi206 Posts: 0

    does marijuana cause lung cancer?

    Although we know that smoking tobacco is a major cause of lung cancer, we do not have as definitive an answer for marijuana. When you smoke cigarettes, you get a lot of nicotine, but you also ingest a lot of other chemicals that are responsible for the damage to the delicate lining of your lungs. Similarly, when you smoke marijuana, you ingest a lot of other chemicals that you don't think about that can similarly irritate your lungs. It normally takes a long time to develop lung cancer from cigarettes; we do not have the long-term data from smoking marijuana yet, but we think it is reasonable to expect that it will have similar effects. For more information about marijuana, go to http://www.marijuana-info.org


Online Poll

Help select the name of the new magazine by casting your vote below.

We are looking for a name the encompasses the entire county. The magazine focuses on all the great things about living in Kittitas County from food and wine, to the arts, to the outdoors and much more.

Total Votes: 312



Autism Resource Links

Autism Society Washington

Autism Guidebook for WA State: PDF document

Autism Society of Washington

WA State Resources: PDF document

Medical and Therapeutic/Support Services

Swedish Neuroscience Institute: Epilepsy

Seattle Children's: Autism Center

Seattle Children's: Autism Blog

University of Washington: Autism Center

Facebook: UW Autism Center

UW Autism Center: Research

Children's Village: Children's Village is a "state of the art" Center for integrated services. Read the Home Page as people don't know there is dental, medical has built up, therapies, swim program, etc...


• The Arc | Washington State

Facebook: Valley Adventures | KC Youth Special Olympics

Outdoors for all: Adaptive seasonal sports and summer camps.

People For People: Transportation financial assistance for medial needs.

The Center for Children with Special Needs: Summer camps for children with special needs in Washington State.

St Luke's Elks Rehab: Advancing adventure in Communicating (AAC Camp) Nampa, Idaho. Many families attend from Washington state this amazing camp!

Epilepsy Foundation Northwest: Camp Discovery — August 18-21, 2014


County marijuana rules

The Kittitas County commissioners are considering changes to the county's marijuana zoning rules. What should they do?

Total Votes: 306